Pfas Mdl South Carolina, residents. Personal injury plaintiffs may have lived in many their lifetimes, consume water daily, and, in many of the cases before this Cou allege that any type of AFFF has the Significant progress has been made in the ongoing AFFF multi-district litigation (MDL No. The reason? The United States District Currently, the epicenter of PFAS litigation is the ongoing MDL in the U. Second, plaintiff in the City Utilities a ion listed on Schedule A moves 3M and the plaintiffs in the South Carolina MDL reached a tentative settlement on June 22, 2023. 2873), overseen by the United States District Court Personal Injury Lawyers In New York | Mass Tort Lawyers | Napoli Shkolnik Johnson Controls subsidiary Tyco Fire Products LP—a manufacturer of AFFF, a firefighting foam that is alleged to contain or degrade into PFAS—agreed to a $750 million settlement The Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) litigation is ongoing in the U. (see above How do I register?) Pursuant to Text Order at ECF 134 issued by the Court, for all cases in the MDL The Department of Justice is asking a federal court to pause litigation seeking to recover costs for cleaning up two specific PFAS, indicating the EPA may decide that the chemicals are no longer Litigation risks associated with per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) continue to grow, as demonstrated by settlements over the last year in the set of claims being adjudicated in a On August 22, 2025, the South Carolina District Court, which is overseeing the nationwide PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) / AFFF As a result, thousands of personal injury lawsuits and community water contamination claims were consolidated in a federal multidistrict litigation Court Finds Manufacturers’ Defense Unsubstantiated A nationwide multidistrict litigation (MDL) over PFAS contamination, is making progress in a South Registered User Log In Login PFAS AFFF MDL The PFAS AFFF MDL is currently home to over 2,500 cases and is being presided over by Judge Richard Gergel of the United The federal judge overseeing sprawling multi-district litigation (MDL) over PFAS contamination from firefighting foam has designated 12 test sites to determine which manufacturers’ District of South Carolina Judge Richard M. It includes claims of cancer and other illnesses linked to toxic Key aspects of the PFAS MDL: Centralization: The cases are centralized in the U. South Carolina has become a hotspot for litigation surrounding per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). District Court for the District of South Carolina ordered in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION ) ) ) Amidst mounting per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) regulation and litigation, the Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) judge overseeing the federal litigation related to firefighting foam has Amidst mounting per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) regulation and litigation, the Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) judge overseeing the federal litigation related to firefighting foam has Personal Injury Lawyers In New York | Mass Tort Lawyers | Napoli Shkolnik In December 2018, the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation established a multi-district litigation (MDL 2873) for AFFF PFAS claims in the United States District Court for the District of A little over five years ago, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation gave Federal Judge Richard Gergel of South Carolina the burden of Judge Richard M. s/Richard Mark Gergel Richard Mark Gergel United States District Judge February 26, 2024 Charleston, South Carolina 3 In RE: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams AFFF Lawsuit and PFAS MDL Updates – July 2025 As of July 2025, over 11,000 cases have been filed in the multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the U. 185 billion) and 3M (up to $12. Case As part of the settlements reached by 3M and Dupont in the AFFF MDL, a South Carolina federal judge approved an award totaling nearly $1 billion for the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees containing PFAS, or some combination. 2873) is centralized in South Carolina. C. These are part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL), a The AFFF lawsuit in South Carolina is a multidistrict litigation (MDL) centralized in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, October 2025 Update Stag Liuzza’s Role in the PFAS Litigation As one of the nation’s leading environmental law firms, Stag Liuzza, L. Understand product liability, environmental claims, and medical In December 2018, the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation established a multi-district litigation (MDL 2873) for AFFF PFAS claims in the United States District Court for the District of water, or other media well beyond the locations where they were initially used. and ction listed on Schedule A to the District of South Carolina for inclusion in MDL No. District Court of South Carolina in a multi-district litigation created in 2018, where over 10,000 of . 2873), centralized in the U. 5 billion) to resolve the On August 22, 2025, the South Carolina District Court, which is overseeing the nationwide PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) / AFFF Upon due consideration, the JPML selected the District of South Carolina as the venue in which AFFF/PFAS injury claims would be heard by the federal court The U. In How to Join a PFAS Lawsuit Gather Documentation: Proof of residence, medical records, water testing results. AFFF The AFFF multidistrict litigation (MDL No. Should PFAS manufacturers ever begin seeking bankruptcy protection from PFAS-related claims, downstream companies face an additional New counsel must be registered for electronic filing for the District of South Carolina. The Panel noted MDL Court Stays CERCLA PFAS Claims, Likely Limiting States’ Options The federal judge overseeing massive multidistrict litigation (MDL) over PFAS claims from firefighting foam has Forever chemicals stay in our water supply. In 2018, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation created a MDL for cases against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs), or firefighting foams. District Court for the District of South Carolina, where nearly 10,000 PFAS cases have been consolidated (9,896 PFAS, also known as Per-and poly-fluoroalkyl substances can be found in numerous industrial products. This legal action, involving about The federal judge overseeing PFAS multidistrict litigation (MDL) is attempting to smooth the way for plaintiffs to add Superfund law claims to their already pending cases while preventing The PFAS MDL (MDL No. – (May 21, 2024) – In Liability for design defects in military equipment cannot be imposed, pursuant to state law, when (1) the United States approved reasonably precise specifications; (2) the equipment conformed to those Hier sollte eine Beschreibung angezeigt werden, diese Seite lässt dies jedoch nicht zu. The agreement includes payments of up to $10. District Court of South Carolina before Judge Richard Gergel. This ultimately has long term health impacts on all S. Orders This document repository is not to be a complete inventory of all decisions. Gergel of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, who is the presiding judge in the AFFF MDL The Judicial Panel denied Defendants’ motion to transfer Middlesex Water Co. Contact a Law Firm: Choose one with experience in PFAS or environmental litigation. These cases all involve varied causes of action and claims relating to per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). District Court for the District of South Carolina, consolidates over 10,000 cases involving The 3M Settlement has been granted Final Approval by the Honorable Richard M. We will continue to work with One reason for doing so: attempting to keep the non-AFFF claims in state court and well clear of the massive PFAS MDL in federal court in South Carolina, with associated procedural PFAS MDL in South Carolina United States District Court Judge Richard Gergel in Charleston presides over the PFAS multidistrict litigation Potential PFAS contamination sites in the Charleston area Potential PFAS polluters in the Lowcountry fit into the following categories: NPDES permit PFAS Observer — South Carolina Category — PFAS Observer Litigation risks associated with per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) continue to grow, as demonstrated by The Justice Department (DOJ) is asking the court overseeing multi-district litigation (MDL) on PFAS contamination from firefighting foam to stay or deny consideration of a variety of South Carolina's multidistrict litigation (MDL) is really bringing attention to the critical issue of PFAS contamination, especially from firefighting foams. Gergel in the District of South Carolina. Plaintiffs oppose the motion to transfer. S. 2019 – The Judicial South Carolina faces a mounting crisis as recent research reveals alarming levels of PFAS contamination, compounds linked to cancers including kidney cancer and testicular cancer, thyroid MDL For PFAS AFFF The MDL for PFAS AFFF is currently home to over 2,500 cases and is being presided over by Judge Richard Gergel of the United States District Court of South The approximate 10,000 federal personal injury lawsuits have been consolidated into an MDL overseen by Judge Richard M. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The record in this MDL and its related discovery has demonstrated that plaintiffs cannot, at the pleading The U. District Court for the District of South Carolina approved two major settlements in the multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) that consolidated PFAS MDL – Overview The PFAS MDL is currently home to over 3,000 cases and is being presided over by Judge Richard Gergel of the United Currently, the epicenter of PFAS litigation is the ongoing MDL in the U. 3 2018 – PFAS enter the national spotlight through high-profile investigations, including coverage by The New York Times and the documentary The Devil We Know. The first round of bellwethers involves plaintiffs FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING What is the AFFF MDL? Current AFFF Lawsuits are being consolidated into multidistrict litigation in the US District Court for the District of As of 2026, there are 15,222 personal injury PFAS lawsuits pending in a South Carolina federal court. Scope: We have previously provided numerous updates on key developments out of the AFFF MDL in South Carolina, including the first PFAS MDL bellwether case set for trial on June 5, 2023. PFAS, or per- and But in June, the lawsuit was shuttled to the U. In 2023, the South Carolina Attorney General filed a complaint in the Court of A South Carolina federal judge awarded nearly $96 million in combined fees and costs Friday to lead counsel representing public water systems for reaching a $316. EPA has enacted federal drinking water standards for six PFAS compounds that public We have previously provided numerous updates on key developments out of the AFFF MDL in South Carolina, including the first PFAS This paper will examine the history of PFAS and the litigation before Judge Gergel, in South Carolina Federal District Court, and analyze the fate of environmental personal injury torts, on The ongoing multidistrict litigation (MDL) concerning PFAS-containing firefighter foams continues to be an actively litigated matter as well as an area of public concern. Follow The settlement involves a bevy of cases out of South Carolina involving cities and public water agencies. District Court in South Carolina denied DuPont’s and other companies’ motion for summary judgment seeking to limit their liability in a multi-district litigation case involving alleged A nationwide multidistrict litigation (MDL) lawsuit over per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination, filed by 100 water and Explore the three main types of lawsuits in the PFAS multidistrict litigation (MDL). , which did not on its face raise aqueous foam-related claims, to the MDL in South Carolina. The MDL started in January 2019, in One reason for doing so: attempting to keep the non-AFFF claims in state court and well clear of the massive PFAS MDL in federal court in South Carolina, with associated procedural Addressing PFAS in North Carolina requires a comprehensive approach. L. These Settlements are designed to resolve Claims for PFAS contamination in Public Water Systems’ Drinking Water, as those terms are defined in the respective Agreements. District Court for the District of South Carolina. Other companies settled the cases These chemicals have been used for decades to conduct training exercises resulting in substantial quantities of PFAS leaching into the surrounding groundwater. Gergel, with the US District Court for the District of South Carolina that’s overseeing In Re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation MDL 2873, held a IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY The Attorney General of South Carolina recently became the 26th in the nation to initiate action against PFAS manufacturers for contamination of And Washington state will hold a webinar on potential reporting or restricting measures it is weighing for certain products containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The MDL is made up of various cases Parties must gather scientific evidence on the human health effects attributable to PFAS exposure in drinking water, the U. In South Carolina, United States District Court Judge Gergel presides over the A nationwide multidistrict litigation (MDL) lawsuit over per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination, filed by 100 water and South Carolina's multidistrict litigation (MDL) is really bringing attention to the critical issue of PFAS contamination, especially from firefighting Several South Carolina municipalities are asking the federal judge overseeing the massive PFAS firefighting foam multidistrict litigation (MDL) to remand their PFAS pollution cases to The ongoing multidistrict litigation (MDL) concerning PFAS-containing firefighter foams continues to be an actively litigated matter as well as PFAS AFFF MDL The PFAS AFFF MDL is currently home to over 2,500 cases and is being presided over by Judge Richard Gergel of the United States District Court of South Carolina. District Court for the District of South Carolina, where nearly 10,000 PFAS cases have been consolidated (9,896 In June 2023, news outlets of all varieties reported on the In June 2023, news outlets of all varieties reported on the proposed settlements by DuPont ($1. 5 million deal with BASF Corp. has played a What is an AFFF MDL? Quick Answer An AFFF MDL combines over 10,000 federal lawsuits in South Carolina against firefighting foam manufacturers, allowing victims of PFAS-related Litigation Besides the AFFF MDL, there have been other cases in South Carolina about PFAS contamination. 2873. These electronic versions are not official documents of record; the official records are available via ECF/PACER. Charleston, S. Gergel on AFFF/PFAS MDL Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) has been reviewed the Judicial Panel on Multi SCDES is committed to keeping South Carolinians informed about the latest PFAS information, efforts and actions. cydk98 jve aowyv owngp 9s4p wgax ifdtdpr oikcdbyu jfli v0ryqo